Open access peer-reviewed chapter
Comparison between GDPR and CCPA, and their relevance to Industry 5.0 [9].
Abstract
With the advent of Industry 5.0 and increasing advancements in this area, the ethical and legal challenges have been surmounted. This chapter will discuss these issues in the context of privacy, fairness, and security along with the evolving relationship between humans and machines at some length. By doing so, an extensive look will be made on how the data is collected through various means and its usage, the trade-offs between how privacy can be maintained and goods be delivered. Similarly, the ethical challenges posed by the algorithms and the biases will be touched. Moving ahead, this chapter will traverse through the legal frameworks, relevant laws, their implications, and what global efforts are required. Moreover, some case studies and best practices like privacy by design, accountability, and cooperation between stakeholders will be discussed viz-a-viz the role of technology. In the end, the chapter will discuss the online collaboration and adaptation to ensure responsible and ethical approach to Industry 5.0.
Keywords
- legal frameworks
- ethics in AI
- cybersecurity
- data privacy
- Industry 5.0
1. Introduction
The industrial world is going through a major transformation as we enter the era of Industry 5.0. With increased connectivity and data-driven processes, this new phase is leading in a smarter automation, more personalized experiences, and unparalleled levels of efficiency [1]. At its heart, Industry 5.0 is about to bring together the physical along with digital worlds by breaking down the hurdles between simple and complex machines and people [2]. However, this syllogism has a cost of exponential surge of growing data.
With machines equipped with sensors and devices and their connection with everything, Industry 5.0 creates a huge amount of data in a variety of forms [3]. This large amount of data, on the one hand, creates opportunities to improve processes, forecast results, and trigger innovation; but on the other hand, it calls for detailed attention to ethical and legal challenges.
In case of overlooking these challenges, we might confront the issues of unchecked scrutiny, prejudiced decision-making, and pronounced data security gaps. However, addressing these ethical and legal challenges responsibly in Industry 5.0 would lead to reaping the benefits of technological progress, which would be beneficial for everybody. This chapter explores this complex landscape of ethical and legal dilemmas related to data in Industry 5.0 and proposes a way toward a responsible and ethical future in the era of transformation.
Advertisement
2. Ethical considerations
Globalization is radically changing the international business environment by creating a “Global Village” [4]. As a result, data is shared across the globe in a very short span of time. This huge amount of sharing of data requires ethical considerations and legal requirements. In the case of businesses, where trust is of paramount importance, data ownership, data consent, privacy, and data control need to be looked at minutely. Maintaining a balance between ethical standards and growing innovations is pivotal in the presence of Artificial Intelligence and machine learning. This balance requires addressing concerns such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the potential for unintended consequences [5].
The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in diverse sectors has raised concerns regarding transparency, trust, and ethical data handling [6]. Industry leaders are, thus, required to remain mindful of the risks of data misuse. Working toward a framework that prioritizes individuals’ rights, transparency of data, and responsible data governance can ensure a positive future for Industry 5.0.
2.1 Delving into privacy and data protection in Industry 5.0: Navigating the path forward
The concerns of data privacy and data protection have unearthed with the progression of Industry 5.0. This calls for responsible and ethical ways of collecting, storing, and using data. Thus, Legislators must create strong data protection laws and guidelines to guarantee that personal data is utilized ethically and legally [7]. This section of the chapter will exclusively discuss current regulations and the new challenges that have emerged with the passage of time.
2.1.1 Regulations and relevance
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) are the two key legislations that are designed to address personal data. Although their main focus is on consumer data, their principles can also address the broader challenges of data management in Industry 5.0 [8]. Ensuring transparency, accountability, and protecting individual rights, such as the “right to be forgotten” and data portability, are some of the key features of GDPR. Similarly, the CCPA gives consumers the rights to access, delete, and opt out of data collection. However, applying these regulations to the intricate data landscapes of Industry 5.0—where data can include industrial processes, complex models, and interconnected systems—brings unique challenges and demands thoughtful interpretation (Table 1) [10].
| Feature | GDPR | CCPA | Relevance to Industry 5.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Personal data of EU citizens, no matter where it is located | Personal data of California residents | Relevant to any company, regardless of industry, that handles data belonging to EU citizens or California residents |
| Key provisions | Rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict, and port personal data | The rights to be informed about the collection, sale, or disclosure of personal data, and the right to opt out of the sale of personal data | Both regulations empower individuals over their personal data, essential in data-driven Industry 5.0 |
| Enforcement | Administrative fines and data processing bans | Civil penalties and private right of action | Both regulations encourage companies to conform with data privacy, which is essential in data practices of Industry 5.0 |
| Sector-specific applicability | All sectors involved in processing personal data | Applies to profit-making businesses that are involved in collecting or selling personal data of the California populaces | Both regulations have access across all sectors |
| Cross-border data transfers | Stern restrictions on the transfer of data outside the European Union, thus require additional safeguards | This law imposed limited restrictions on cross-border data transfers | GDPR’s stringency can create challenges for Industry 5.0 companies that are operating globally and thus, require cautious data transfer mechanisms |
| Focus on consent | GDPR requires fair and agreeing consent for both data collection and processing | Opt-out mechanism for data sale | Both legislations highlight individual consent and require Industry 5.0 companies to be transparent while data practices are made and obtain meaningful consent |
| Transparency and accountability | Data Controllers are there to take appropriate technical and organizational measures for protecting personal data | Businesses have to disclose their data collection practices and mechanisms to be defined for individuals to practice their rights | Both legislations promote transparency and accountability which is crucial for trust in data-driven practices in Industry 5.0 |
Table 1.
Both GDPR and CCPA empower individuals with regard to their personal data. There are provisions for companies in both legislations to remain fair and transparent. GDPR applies fines and bans on the violators, which makes compliance more pronounced. CCPA, on the other hand, highlights the provisions of right-to-know and opt-out rules, which require clear communication and respect for people’s choices. To navigate this complex world, we need to understand regulations that are applied to all industries, regardless of their sector or their location. This will help in ensuring responsible data practices, building trust, and a sustainable future in Industry 5.0.
2.1.2 Ethical difficulties
Although regulations and laws play an active role in streamlining data collection, storage, access, transparency, and protection, the role of ethics in this regard cannot be denied. A large amount of data stored for long periods increases concerns about security gaps and misuse [1]. The “right to be forgotten” also presents a major challenge in Industry 5.0. Although GDPR acknowledges this right [9], it requires careful thought. Finding an equilibrium between personal privacy rights and the collective benefits of data-driven innovation asks for ethical and legal frameworks particularly designed in the context of Industry 5.0 [11].
2.1.3 Consent challenges
A person’s consent plays a pivotal role in disclosing his data [9]. Sometimes, individuals may inadvertently give consent for their data collection and disclosure owing to their inability to understand the legal jargon or lack of clear alternatives [12]. This raises concerns about ensuring genuine consent and fresh approaches to transparency and user control.
2.1.4 Navigating the path forward
To tackle ethical challenges and best utilization of existing regulations, a multi-dimensional approach is required [13]. The organizations should focus on transparency, and while doing so, they must clearly explain how data is collected and used. It is also pivotal to follow the principle of “privacy-by-design”, which includes minimizing the data collection and using anonymization techniques. Also, users should be offered real control over their data and clear consent options in order to build trust and ensure compliance with ethical data management.
The nexus between privacy and the ethical use of data in Industry 5.0 requires considerable collaboration [14]. Continuous dialog between policymakers, industry leaders, researchers, and civil society is essential to develop regulatory frameworks so that innovation and data protection may be kept in balance. Additionally, technological advancements like privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) and explainable AI (XAI) also offer promising solutions for mitigating privacy risks and building trust.
As Industry 5.0 is a reality, so, it is crucial to prudently navigate the complex issues of data privacy and its protection. By acknowledging these challenges, including respecting the rights of individuals and encouraging innovative solutions, mankind can be served in a better way in this technological era.
2.2 Algorithmic bias and fairness: Traversing the ethical domain of Industry 5.0
The reliance of Industry 5.0 on algorithms in order to make decisions and allocate resources invites innumerable ethical concerns pertaining to biasedness and fairness [15]. This section explores the risks associated with biased algorithms along with the importance of transparency and clarity. Various ways have been proposed to address biasedness and promote fair treatment.
2.2.1 The adverse side of algorithms
Algorithms can spread societal biases present in the data. Factors pertaining to race, gender, and socioeconomic status may result in unfairness while approving loans, employment, and in criminal justice predictions [16]. Transparency issue in explainable AI may further exacerbate the situation [17].
2.2.2 Transparency and explainability: A path forward
Knowing about how algorithms make decisions helps us identify and fix problems. Techniques like feature importance analysis and interpretable machine learning models can give us detailed insight into how these algorithms might work [18]. Furthermore, the involvement of humans in important decision-making processes can be helpful in removing bias [11].
2.2.3 Approaching a fairer future
To reduce bias, we need to take a few steps. Firstly, the data we use to train algorithms should be diverse and accurate. Secondly, regular checking of algorithms for biasedness and testing those on a regular basis can help us fix the problems. Furthermore, having a team with people from different backgrounds involved in creating and using algorithms might bring in different ideas and ultimately help in spotting potential biases [19].
It is important for us to be fair and honest while dealing with the bias in Industry 5.0’s algorithms. Being transparent and having diverse teams involved in the development of algorithms is pivotal for creating technology that benefits mankind.
2.3 Protecting data in the age of Industry 5.0
In recent era of connectedness, data has gained prime importance [20]. Therefore, security and responsibility have become more important. This section talks about the critical role of cybersecurity, the ethical problems around who owns data and how it is used, and the importance of developing AI responsibly and ethically auditing systems.
2.3.1 Securing the flood of data
In the era of Industry 5.0, the risks to cybersecurity are immense. These risks might lead to big financial losses, damage to a company’s reputation, and even physical harm to a person [1]. Effective cybersecurity measures including encryption, access control, and periodical vulnerability assessments are, therefore, required. It is important to educate employees and partners about cybersecurity in order to prevent mistakes and social engineering attacks [21].
2.3.2 Navigating the ownership of data
In Industry 5.0, deciding who owns the data is a big ethical question. We need clear laws and ethical guidelines to decide who owns and is responsible for the data. Balancing effect as well as collaboration is the order of the day insofar as the rights of individuals are concerned. We need to be fair and transparent about data ownership and usage [22].
2.3.3 Accountability in the era of AI
As we rely more on AI to make decisions, we need to think about who is responsible, and when things go wrong. Is it the people who made the AI, the people who use it, or the AI itself? This is a big ethical problem and needs new answers which include making AI easier to understand and finding ways to stop the biasedness in the algorithms [23].
2.3.4 Ethical auditing: Protecting trust
Gradual checking to ensure that all things are done ethically is pivotal in Industry 5.0. Checks should look at the data security and ethical problems that come from its collection, usage of data, and development of AI. The involvement of people with the technology would result in building and protecting trust. Security and responsibility go hand-in-hand in Industry 5.0 [24]. By protecting data, protecting its ownership, and developing AI in a responsible way, we can unearth the huge potential of this new era.
Advertisement
3. Legal framework
The rules and laws for Industry 5.0 are changing quickly as technology moves forward. Governments and international groups/organizations are working together to update, amend, and adapt laws. Privacy-oriented laws like GDPR and CCPA are playing a critical role in how companies handle and protect sensitive information [9]. Cybercrime laws are also playing their part in fighting threats. There is a dire need that Industries should strengthen their cybersecurity to comply with these laws. As the legal landscape keeps changing, industry leaders need to actively work with regulators in order to stay informed about the latest rules. Moreover, navigating this changing legal landscape requires a strategic and collaborative approach, where organizations should work together to create sensible, future-proof regulations.
3.1 Evolving regulations and policy frameworks: Determining future of Industry 5.0
Industry 5.0 has rapidly changed how we collect, analyze, and use data, so laws and regulations also need to be improved. This section will look at universal efforts to regulate data privacy, AI, and new technologies. It will also explore the legal challenges arise from Industry 5.0 practices and how these changing regulations are affecting this evolving era.
3.1.1 Global efforts in Industry 5.0
Considerable efforts and initiatives are underway to develop global regulations governing data privacy, AI, and emerging technologies. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) represent substantial steps, however, their applicability to the globalized data flows of Industry 5.0 poses a daunting challenge [10]. Although the AI Principles of organisation for economic co-operation and development’s (OECD) offer global guidelines, the lack of enforcement mechanisms is not adequately mentioned therein. Similarly, the Global Privacy Assembly (GPA) also aims to facilitate cross-border cooperation on data governance, signifying the need for harmonized solutions, but still needs to be done [23].
3.1.2 Legal challenges in Industry 5.0
Insofar as legal challenges are concerned in Industry 5.0, data ownership has become a complex phenomenon, especially when data is generated across organizations or countries, figuring out who owns what and who is responsible for this data [24]. It can lead to legal problems. When AI makes bad decisions, it is imperative to decipher who is to blame. Also, we need laws that work across borders to protect data privacy while still allowing for collaboration and innovation [1].
3.1.3 Keeping abreast about the nexus of law and Industry 5.0
New laws are changing rapidly in accordance with Industry 5.0. Companies are adapting how they collect, store, and use data to keep in line with the changing laws. While following these rules, it is important to find a balance between innovation and ethics. We need open conversations between policymakers, industry leaders, and people to create laws that promote responsible innovation. To recognize the need for global collaboration, adaptable regulations, and open dialog among stakeholders, it is essential to ensure that legal frameworks are there to facilitate responsible data practices [22].
3.2 Global companies in Industry 5.0: Facing legal challenges
Different industries have different legal needs. We need rules that fit each industry, especially when it comes to securing sensitive data. Global companies are also facing the challenge of following laws in many different countries [25].
3.2.1 Navigating the sectoral areas in Industry 5.0
The data practices and legal considerations of Industry 5.0 differ significantly across various sectors. For instance, healthcare faces stringent regulations like health insurance portability and accountability act (HIPAA) governing patient data privacy and security, while the financial sector operates under regulations like Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML). Different industries have their own set of rules to follow, creating a complex patchwork of laws that companies must navigate [8].
3.2.2 Sensitive data handling
Data, like biometric or genetic information, are very sensitive and need special rules. Industry 5.0 involves creating such data a lot, so we need specific laws to protect it. We need to have conversations between industry experts, policymakers, and people to create laws that protect sensitive data. Open dialog between industry experts, policymakers, and civil society is pivotal in developing targeted regulations while fostering responsible innovation in these domains [23].
3.2.3 Global reach and its issues in Industry 5.0
Global companies that want to operate under Industry 5.0 have to comply with various national and regional regulations. Although the Global Privacy Assembly (GPA) aims to facilitate cross-border cooperation, there is still much to do at the international level that might result in responsible data practices [10]. To make Industry 5.0 more responsible and equipped with ethical values, we need to understand the specific and necessary needs of various industries and create laws accordingly. This is vital for sensitive data.
3.3 Delving into case studies: Implications for legal scenario and industry practices
We can learn a lot from real-life cases about how laws and practices might change in the future when it comes to data privacy, AI, and Industry 5.0.
3.3.1 Data privacy
Schrems II: The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its ruling on Case C-311/18 (“Schrems II”) stated that the Privacy Shield framework governing data transfers between the EU and the US was invalid [26]. This case is important because it shows how the EU is severer about data protection than other places. This also forces the other countries to strengthen their privacy laws. We also need to have the same data protection rules around the world to make it easier for companies to share data. Industry 5.0 companies that work in many countries will need to change how they handle data to follow these new rules.
Clearview AI (Mass Surveillance involvement): Clearview AI broke Canadian law and sold three billion photos of Canadians, which raises privacy concerns and fears of the government overstepping legal boundaries and behaving in an overly scrutinizing manner, similar to the concept of “big brother” [27]. This case highlights important questions about mass surveillance, biometric data privacy, and the potential for misuse of AI. It might lead to regulations restricting large-scale data collection and stern controls on personal data usage by commercial bodies. This could also impact how facial recognition, along with biometric technologies, is employed in Industry 5.0 applications that require transparent practices and user consent systems.
3.3.2 AI and algorithmic bias
COMPAS Recidivism Prediction Tool: This case study is an example of algorithmic bias while using AI. COMPAS, a recidivism prediction tool used by US courts, was found as racially biased, disproportionately predicting higher recidivism risk for Black defendants compared to white defendants with similar criminal histories. The widely used commercial risk assessment software COMPAS was found to be less accurate or fair than predictions made by people with little or no criminal justice expertise [28]. One has to be aware of bias in AI and must fix it before time. Companies should invest in developing AI responsibly and formulate a mechanism to regularly check the bias in order to make sure that everyone is treated fairly.
Amazon’s Recruiting Algorithm: This case study highlights the importance of diversity and inclusivity in AI development. Amazon developed an AI tool to automate resume screening, using NLP and ML to identify top candidates based on similarities to successful applicants. However, it was found that the AI system theoretically in the future might develop a system of sorting candidates that could to some degree be discriminatory [29]. The study, therefore, underscores the need for careful consideration of data bias and the potential for algorithms to amplify existing societal inequalities.
3.3.3 Industry 5.0 specific case study
The Volkswagen emissions scandal highlights the large legal and somewhat reputation problems that can occur when data is manipulated in the industry. In September 2015, VW had admitted to United States regulators that it had deliberately installed “defeat devices” in many of its diesel cars, which enabled the cars to cheat on federal and state emissions tests, making them able to pass the tests and hit ambitious mileage and performance targets while actually emitting up to 40 times more hazardous gases into the atmosphere than legally allowed [30]. In Industry 5.0, where data is of utmost importance for making decisions, it is imperative that data accuracy and transparency must be maintained. Therefore, strong cybersecurity, good data management, and internal controls are required to make sure that the data is accurate and not tampered with.
The fines given to Google and Facebook for breach of data show how serious these regulations and rules are. There are, of course, very strict privacy limitations to such business models that may diminish their revenue [31]. Thus, companies in Industry 5.0 are required to focus on data governance and strictly follow the rules to avoid huge fines which ultimately damage their reputation. So, investing in people who have a fair knowledge of data protection, along with adopting strong measures and regular checks, is the order of the day (Table 2).
| Case | Data privacy issue | Industry 5.0 application | Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schrems II [26] | Limits on data transfers due to weak data protection rules | Data moving between countries and analyzing data | Global rules for data protection. This will help data sharing in Industry 5.0 |
| Clearview AI [27] | Widespread surveillance and privacy concerns about biometric data | Face recognition and ID verification | Potential misuse of sensitive data, so the need of the hour is to implement strict controls and ethical considerations in AI |
| COMPAS Recidivism Prediction Tool [28] | Bias in the algorithms found in terms of racial discrimination | Assessment of risks and credit scoring | AI needs to be clear and humans must fix any bias in AI to make sure that decisions are made fair in Industry 5.0 |
| Amazon’s Recruiting Algorithm [29] | Recruitment system found discriminatory | Fair recruitment policy without any prejudice or discrimination | It is important that AI is fair and accountable, especially when it makes decisions that affect people’s lives |
| Volkswagen emissions scandal [30] | Industrial settings experiencing data manipulations | Sensor data, industrial digitalization | Changing or faking data can be dangerous. It is important to be honest and transparent about data in Industry 5.0 |
| GDPR fines against Google and Facebook [31] | Data protection enforcement actions | Personalized advertising and data-driven marketing | These cases show how important data protection rules are and the consequences of not following them. Companies in Industry 5.0 need to focus on data governance and compliance |
Table 2.
Case study comparison between data privacy, Industry 5.0 application, and implications.
These cases show the complicated legal issues around data privacy, AI, and Industry 5.0. They highlight that:
We need stronger rules for data protection and strict laws as to how data is collected and used.
AI uses have to be clear, easy to understand, and fair.
Companies need to focus on data management and follow the rules to avoid legal problems and damage to their reputation.
There is a need to involve businesses, policymakers, and people. They need to work in a collaborative manner to navigate the changing laws in Industry 5.0.
By solving these problems, we can create a future where data helps us innovate while also being fair and protecting people’s rights in Industry 5.0.
3.3.4 Future implications
These examples will elaborate on what might happen next in terms of laws and practices:
Increased regulatory scrutiny: We can expect strict rules for data protection, ethical guidelines for AI, and special rules for sensitive data in Industry 5.0.
Focus on transparency and explainability: AI needs to be clear, accountable, and easy to understand and address bias.
Data governance becomes central: Companies need to focus on data management, protect their systems from cyber-attacks, and regularly check for compliance with the prevalent rules.
Collaboration is the key: Everyone needs to be involved, like businesses, policymakers, and people. They need to talk and work in a collective manner to create responsible AI principles, ethical data practices, and malleable rules for Industry 5.0.
By learning from these past cases, companies in Industry 5.0 can prepare for the future and help create a world where data is used responsibly and ethically. These are just a few examples. Each case is different and depends on the situation. By studying these and other cases, we can learn a lot about the legal landscape of data privacy, AI, and Industry 5.0. This can help us create a better future that is both responsible and ethical.
3.4 The EU AI act: Making the ethical and legal landscape for Industry 5.0
The European Union (EU) is leading the way with new laws called the AI Act. This law aims to create a complete set of rules for developing, using, and deploying AI systems. The AI Act also puts AI systems into different groups based on how risky they are. High-risk systems, which could have a big impact on people’s rights or safety, will have stringent rules. The EU’s AI Act is important for ensuring AI is used ethically and responsibly in this new era [32]. Understanding the specific requirements and limitations of the AI Act will be pivotal for navigating the ethical and legal scenario of data in Industry 5.0. The EU’s AI Act is a new way to categorize AI systems based on how risky they are. This Act helps to make sure the rules for AI are right for each type of system. High-risk AI systems, like those used in healthcare and transportation, will have stricter rules to protect people’s rights and safety.
Industry 5.0 is about people and machines working together in a connected world. The EU’s AI Act wants to build trust and accountability. Companies need to follow the rules in this law so that they can operate in a transparent manner and ensure accountability.
Advertisement
4. Finding ways in the changing world
In the presence of Industry 5.0, where everything is connected, we need to remain careful about the ethical and legal challenges of the data. We also need to protect our digital borders from cyber threats. In addition, Industry leaders must stay up-to-date on regulations, compliance standards, and changing laws and make sure that their data practices remain ethical and transparent. They need to talk to regulators, privacy advocates, and the community to create a safe and ethical environment. This would lead the companies to stay informed and be able to protect data with integrity by earning the trust of the people.
4.1 Best practices and recommendations: Circumnavigating the ethical data landscape of Industry 5.0
As companies are moving forward in Industry 5.0 and using more data, it is imperative to understand the ethical and legal issues involved. This section offers practical advice, suggests ways to manage data, and emphasizes the importance of always improving and working with stakeholders.
4.1.1 Charting the ethical course
Privacy by design: There is a need to think about privacy from the beginning while collecting, storing, and using data. Collect as little data as possible, make it anonymous if you can, and use strong security to protect access [16].
Transparency and explainability: Be clear about how you handle data and give people control over their information. Explain how AI works and be as transparent as possible [11].
Ethical AI principles: Build AI that is fair, does not discriminate, and is accountable [18]. Have different people working on AI and regularly check for bias to make sure it is used ethically.
Security through collaboration: Use strong security measures like encryption, access control, and checks for vulnerabilities. Educate everyone about cybersecurity and work together with partners to create a safe data environment.
Data governance frameworks: Use good data management practices like GDPR and CCPA. But also push for rules that fit the special needs of Industry 5.0. [9].
4.1.2 Acquiring continuous improvement
Using data ethically needs constant attention and improvement. Regularly checking how we handle data, conducting ethical audits, and working with others are important for finding and fixing problems.
4.1.3 Stakeholder engagement: Building trust
To build trust, we need to talk and work with different people, like individuals, regulators, community groups, and other companies. By being open and honest, developing AI responsibly, and communicating challenges clearly, we can make Industry 5.0 work for everyone.
By following these best practices, companies in Industry 5.0 can navigate the ethical and legal challenges of data. Focusing on privacy, transparency, fairness, and security would help in embracing these challenges.
4.2 Future implications and potential solutions: Charting a responsible roadmap for Industry 5.0
Industry 5.0 is always changing, so we need to keep finding new ways to handle ethical and legal challenges. This section talks about the potential of new technologies like blockchain, the future of data management, and the importance of working together to create a responsible future.
4.2.1 Emerging technologies on the horizon
Blockchain technology through its shared ledger and strong security can improve data security and transparency in Industry 5.0 [33]. By enabling secure data sharing and access control, blockchain could revolutionize data governance, fostering trust and collaboration within complex value chains. Moreover, exploring the potential of privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) like homomorphic encryption and secure multi-party computation can offer promising solutions for mitigating privacy concerns related to data analysis and sharing [17].
4.2.2 Navigating the regulatory measures
Technology is changing quickly, so we need laws and regulations that can adapt. Existing rules like GDPR and CCPA might need to be updated to fit the new challenges of Industry 5.0. We also need to work together with other countries to create global rules that make it easier for data to move around while still protecting people’s privacy.
4.2.3 Collaboration: The guiding principle of progress
To make Industry 5.0 responsible and ethical, everyone involved needs to talk and work together. Businesses should focus on ethical data management and be transparent and accountable. Policymakers should actively engage with businesses and people to create flexible rules that promote innovation while being ethical. Civil society organizations are important in advocating for people’s rights and holding everyone accountable. By working together, we can ensure that Industry 5.0 benefits everyone.
The ethical and legal issues around data in Industry 5.0 are challenging, but they also offer a chance for a better future. We need to embrace new technologies, advocate for flexible regulations, and work together with others. By focusing on responsible innovation, we can use data to empower people and benefit society as a whole.
4.3 ENISA’s role: Strengthening cybersecurity for ethical AI in Industry 5.0
The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) is important in helping us deal with cybersecurity problems caused by new technologies like AI. ENISA’s work on AI security provides valuable insights into the ethical and legal issues of data in Industry 5.0. Their publications, like the “Multilayer Framework for Good Cybersecurity Practices for AI” [34], emphasize the importance of strong security measures throughout the whole process of using AI. ENISA’s ongoing research on AI and cybersecurity also shows the need to stay alert and adapt to this fast-changing field. ENISA is also doing research on AI and cybersecurity to stay up-to-date on new threats and vulnerabilities. By doing things like threat assessments and vulnerability analyses, ENISA aims to improve the security of AI systems and help companies implement effective security measures.
ENISA’s work on AI security is very important for making sure data is used ethically and legally in Industry 5.0. By working together with policymakers, businesses, and cybersecurity experts, ENISA is helping to create a strong security framework that allows AI to be used safely and responsibly in this changing industrial world.
Advertisement
5. Conclusion: Finding the right way in the complex world of data in Industry 5.0
Industry 5.0 offers innumerable possibilities, on the one hand, but on the other hand, there are some ethical and legal challenges to be considered. Therefore, everyone needs to work together to address these issues.
Balancing innovation and privacy: In Industry 5.0, it is important to find the right balance between using data to innovate and protecting people’s privacy. Laws like GDPR and CCPA show that strong data protection rules are necessary to build trust and use data responsibly [9]. But, if the rules are too strict, it could slow down innovation. We need laws that are flexible and can adapt to change while still being ethical.
Removing algorithmic bias: The case of “COMPAS Recidivism Prediction Tool” shows the dangers of bias in algorithms [28]. We need to be transparent and accountable when developing AI [18]. We need to build AI in a way that prevents bias. This will help ensure everyone is treated fairly and responsibly.
Clarity in data ownership and accountability: Determining ownership and accountability for data generated in complex, collaborative environments remains a legal and ethical conundrum. The Clearview AI case exemplifies the potential misuse of sensitive data and necessitates clear ownership structures and robust accountability mechanisms [27]. Everyone involved, like businesses, policymakers, and legal experts, needs to work together to create clear and fair rules for data ownership and accountability in Industry 5.0.
Navigating the regulatory challenges: The rules and regulations are always changing, especially for companies that work in different countries. This makes it difficult for them to follow all the rules [17]. We need global rules for data protection. Working together with other countries is important to make sure data is used responsibly in this interconnected world.
Responsible data management: The key to success in this complex world is responsible data management. Being transparent about how you handle data, just like the fines against Google and Facebook show [31], is important for building trust and being accountable. Strong cybersecurity, ethical AI development, and regular checks are essential for a sustainable and trustworthy future.
A call to collective action: Creating a responsible and ethical Industry 5.0 requires everyone to be involved [24].
Industry leaders: Use data responsibly, protect people’s privacy, and be clear about how you use data [35].
Policymakers: Create flexible rules that work everywhere and promote innovation while being ethical [5].
Civil society organizations: Stand up for people’s rights, make sure everyone is accountable, and help create ethical data practices [14].
Individuals: Know your rights when it comes to data [21]. Understand how data is collected and used, and make sure companies are responsible for your information.
By working together and following ethical principles, we can create a responsible future for Industry 5.0. Let us work together to make sure data empowers people and benefits everyone.
Advertisement
Acknowledgments
I would like to acknowledge the valuable assistance of Gemini, an AI tool in the development of this chapter. Specifically, I used it to improve grammar, enhance sentence structure, and refine certain headings. Gemini provided helpful suggestions and insights in improving the overall language clarity and coherence of the headings, grammar, and sentence structure of the Chapter.
While the AI tool was used in shaping and correcting the text, the final product is the result of human-guided input and judgment.
References
- 1.
Rajabion L. Industry 5.0 and cyber crime security threats. In: Advanced Research and Real-World Applications of Industry 5.0. Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global; 2023. pp. 66-76 - 2.
Mohamed M. Challenges and benefits of industry 4.0: An overview. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management. 2018; 5 (3):256-265 - 3.
Kagermann H, Helbig J, Winkler I. Industrie 4.0: Mit dem internet der dinge auf neue geschäftsmodelle. Düsseldorf, Germany: VDE VERLAG GmbH; 2013 - 4.
Bilan SM. The business environment as a Global Village. In: Neoliberalism in the Tourism and Hospitality Sector. Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global; 2019. pp. 118-131 - 5.
Ivanov D, Petrova A. Ethical AI: Balancing innovation with responsibility in artificial intelligence development. MZ Computing Journal. 2024; 5 (1):20-25 - 6.
Olateju O, Okon SU, Olaniyi OO, Samuel-Okon AD, Asonze CU. Exploring the concept of explainable AI and developing information governance standards for enhancing trust and transparency in handling customer data. SSRN . 2024 - 7.
Hassan MA, Zardari S, Farooq MU, Alansari MM, Nagro SA. Systematic analysis of risks in Industry 5.0 architecture. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14 (4):1466 - 8.
Freiherr von dem Bussche A. Data Protection 4.0 for Industry 4.0. In: Liquid Legal: Towards a Common Legal Platform. Berlin, Germany: ResearchGate; 2020. pp. 479-492 - 9.
Bradley S. Comparative Analysis of Two Data Privacy Regulatory Schemes: The GDPR and the CCPA. United States: Seton Hall University; 2024 - 10.
Rajesh R. Industry 5.0: Analyzing the challenges in implementation using grey influence analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2023; 36 (5):1349-1371 - 11.
Wachter S, Mittelstadt B, Floridi L. Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between technological affordances and ethical norms. Ethics of Information Technology. 2017; 19 (2):311-338 - 12.
Giannopoulou A. Algorithmic systems: The consent is in the detail? Internet Policy Review. 2020; 9 (1):1-19 - 13.
Zimmer M. “But the data is already public”: On the ethics of research in Facebook. In: The Ethics of Information Technologies. Berlin, Germany: Routledge; 2020. pp. 229-241 - 14.
Tyagi AK, Lakshmi Priya R, Mishra AK, Balamurugan G. Industry 5.0: Potentials, Issues, Opportunities, and Challenges for Society 5.0. Privacy Preservation of Genomic and Medical Data; 2023. pp. 409-432 - 15.
Ejjami R, Boussalham K. Resilient supply chains in industry 5.0: Leveraging AI for predictive maintenance and risk mitigation. IJFMR-International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. 2024; 6 (4):1-33 - 16.
Buolamwini J, Gebru T. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR; 2018. pp. 77-91. Available from: https://proceedings.mlr.press/ - 17.
Rudin C. Stop explaining black box models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2019; 1 (11):246-254 - 18.
Bogina V, Hartman A, Kuflik T, Shulner-Tal A. Educating software and AI stakeholders about algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2021; 32 (6):1-26 - 19.
Schwartz R, Schwartz R, Vassilev A, Greene K, Perine L, Burt A, et al. Towards a Standard for Identifying and Managing Bias in Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 3. Gaithersburg, USA: US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2022 - 20.
Ordieres-Meré J, Gutierrez M, Villalba-Díez J. Toward the industry 5.0 paradigm: Increasing value creation through the robust integration of humans and machines. Computers in Industry. 2023; 150 :103947 - 21.
Thomas J. Individual cyber security: Empowering employees to resist spear phishing to prevent identity theft and ransomware attacks. International Journal of Business Management. 2018; 12 (3):1-23 - 22.
Fairness Concerns with Algorithmic Control. FATML Workshop on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning. Available from: https://www.fatml.org/ - 23.
Mittelstadt B, Wachter S, Floridi L. Why privacy is inherently ambiguous. Nature Biotechnology. 2016; 34 (5):502-504 - 24.
George AS, George AH. Industrial revolution 5.0: The transformation of the modern manufacturing process to enable man and machine to work hand in hand. Journal of Seybold Report. 2020; 1533 :9211 - 25.
George AS, George AH. Revolutionizing manufacturing: Exploring the promises and challenges of Industry 5.0. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal. 2023; 1 (2):22-38 - 26.
Available from: https://www.gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=CJEU_-_C-311/18_-_Schrems_II - 27.
Jama A. The politics of surveillance: Upholding the privacy rights of racialized peoples in the digital age [doctoral dissertation]. Toronto, Canada: Toronto Metropolitan University - 28.
Dressel J, Farid H. The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science Advances. 2018; 4 (1):eaao5580 - 29.
Kodiyan AA. An overview of ethical issues in using AI systems in hiring with a case study of Amazon’s AI based hiring tool. Researchgate Preprint. 2019; 22 (4):1-19 - 30.
Lynch LJ, Coleman AR, Cutro C, Cutro C, Lynch LJ, Coleman AR, et al. The Volkswagen Emissions Scandal. Virginia, USA: Darden Business Publishing Cases; 2016. pp. 1-17 - 31.
Esteve A. The business of personal data: Google, Facebook, and privacy issues in the EU and the USA. International Data Privacy Law. 2017; 7 (1):36-47 - 32.
Bas G, Salinas C, Tinoco R, Sevilla J. The EU AI act: A pioneering effort to regulate frontier AI? Inteligencia Artificial. 2024; 27 (73):55-64 - 33.
Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai H, Dong X, Huang Y, Wang C. An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. IEEE Access. 2017; 6 :5880-5893 - 34.
Polemi N, Praça I. A multilayer framework for good cybersecurity practices for AI. In: Tech. Rep. 2023. Available from: https://www.enisa.europa.eu/ - 35.
Leng J, Sha W, Wang B, Zheng P, Zhuang C, Liu Q, et al. Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2022; 65 :279-295